.png)
The Second Lecture in the Series of Graduate Lectures on Error Analysis in Teaching Arabic to Non-Native Speakers
The Concept of Linguistic Error and the Evolution of Its Treatment in Linguistic Studies
Summary of My Lecture for Graduate Students of Arabic as a Foreign Language
August 7, 2026
The Second Lecture in the Series of Graduate Lectures on Error Analysis in Teaching Arabic to Non-Native Speakers
The Concept of Linguistic Error and the Evolution of Its Treatment in Linguistic Studies
In the name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful.
Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and companions.
In today’s lecture, we continue what we began in the previous lecture. This is the second lecture in the series on Error Analysis in Teaching Arabic to Non-Native Speakers.
In our previous lecture, we started from a central premise: linguistic error is not merely a deviation from what is considered correct; rather, it is a source of scientific information that reveals how learners acquire a language and how they gradually construct their linguistic system. The scientific value of an error does not lie merely in its occurrence, but in our ability to interpret it scientifically in a way that enables us to diagnose learning difficulties and develop more effective instructional interventions.
Today, we take another step along this path by addressing an issue that may initially appear simple, but which in fact constitutes the foundation of research concerned with error analysis: the concept of linguistic error.
I would like to begin with a question:
Can we analyze something before reaching an agreement on what it means?
The obvious answer is: No.
Every scientific study begins with defining its concepts, establishing precise terminology, and drawing clear boundaries between related concepts. When researchers differ in their understanding of a term, their findings and approaches to dealing with the phenomenon under investigation are likely to differ as well.
Therefore, the first question that a researcher in the field of teaching Arabic to non-native speakers should ask is:
What is meant by linguistic error?
Is every violation of a grammatical rule necessarily an error?
Is there a distinction between an error and a slip or momentary lapse?
And do linguists, teachers, and psycholinguists view error in the same way?
These questions are not merely abstract theoretical questions. They directly influence the way data are collected, errors are classified and interpreted, and even the way teachers respond to learners and their performance in the classroom.
First: Linguistic Error in the Arab Linguistic Heritage
When we turn to the Arab linguistic heritage, we find that the issue of error occupied the attention of scholars from the earliest centuries. However, it was approached within a context that differs from the one in which we study it today.
Early scholars were primarily concerned with protecting the Arabic language from lحن (laḥn), preserving the linguistic integrity of the Qur’an, the Prophetic traditions, classical Arabic poetry, and the Arabic language in general. This concern gave rise to works on laḥn, books devoted to linguistic correction, and scholarly writings addressing correct and incorrect usage.
The dominant perspective at the time was based on a clear normative criterion: any departure from established, eloquent Arabic usage was regarded as linguistic error or laḥn that required correction.
This approach played a crucial role in preserving Arabic and establishing its grammatical and linguistic norms, a contribution whose significance cannot be denied. Nevertheless, this perspective primarily viewed error from the standpoint of linguistic correction and the preservation of appropriate usage, rather than treating it as a means of understanding the process of language learning itself.
Second: The Shift in Modern Linguistic Studies
In modern linguistic studies, however, the question gradually began to change.
Researchers were no longer satisfied with simply stating:
“This expression is correct, while that expression is incorrect.”
Instead, they began to ask:
How did this error arise?
What does it reveal about the learner’s way of thinking?
Could an error be evidence of progress in language learning rather than evidence of failure?
At this point, the concept of error began to move beyond the domain of judging linguistic performance and into the domain of interpreting the learning process itself.
We can therefore say that the concept of linguistic error underwent a profound transformation. It gradually shifted from viewing error as a deviation from a linguistic rule to viewing it as an indicator of the learner’s developing linguistic knowledge.
This transformation did not occur suddenly. Rather, it was the result of a long process of development in linguistics, psychology, and theories of language learning.
This is why tracing the evolution of the concept of error is so important. Understanding this development helps us understand the changes that have taken place in language-teaching methodologies and in the ways researchers and teachers perceive learners’ performance and errors.
From the modern perspective, therefore, error is no longer merely an outcome that needs to be corrected. It has become linguistic data that can be analyzed and interpreted, enabling us to identify the nature of the difficulties learners encounter and the strategies they employ as they construct their developing linguistic system.
This perspective provides the foundation from which we will continue our study in the forthcoming lectures.
Next Lecture
The Concept of Linguistic Error Between the Arab Linguistic Heritage and Modern Linguistics
